STATEMENT by the Ossetian
part of the JCC on unfair assessment of the situation in the Georgian-Ossetian
conflict Zone by the OSCE
South-Ossetian side notes that the work of
the OSCE in regulating the Georgian-Ossetian conflict has greatly contributed
to the peace development over many years of its activity in the conflict zone.
The special tribute shall be given to the
positive role of the OSCE in realizing the projects of economic rehabilitation
of the Georgian-Ossetian conflict zone, in holding the meetings for politicians
and journalists and participating in the peace-talks.
At the same time, while analyzing the
recent reports of the OSCE regarding the situation in the Georgian-Ossetian
conflict zone, unfortunately we have to state that the OSCE Mission in Georgia
trends to pursue the double-standards in assessing the current situation.
The reports by the OSCE Mission in
Military aggression of Georgian side
against
Even the fact of brutal torture and
assassination of the Ossetian lawenforcement official G. Sanakoev by Georgian
military troops failed to find expression in the reports of the OSCE though the
officers of this organization attended the process of forensic medicine.
We believe that the delegation of the OSCE
member-states and the leaders of those country will contribute to the fair
settlement of Georgian-Ossetian conflict,
however, the information submitted them by the OSCE Mission in Georgia
unfortunately breeds the wrong assumption on the confrontation between the
Republic of South Ossetia and Georgia.
We are fully aware that the OSCE Mission in
Seems that the activity
of Tskhinvali Office of the OSCE does not comply with the position and
principles of this respected organization.
We hope that the OSCE Mission will take
into account the aforementioned facts and take steps for effective
implementation of its mandate of mediator in
We assume that the OSCE Mission in
In order to settle the Georgian-Ossetian
conflict, we find necessary to advise the OSCE Mission in Georgia with regard
of pursuing unbiased attitude in its activity, as well as of objectively
informing the leadership of the OSCE about the ongoing situation in the Georgian-Ossetian
conflict zone and refraining from biased assessments of the situation in the
Ossetian-Georgian conflict zone, in accordance with their mandate.
(Archive of the Staff of the State Minister
of